A document review list identifies a source, its subject and the actual proposal it represents. File availability is only one part of the record. Ask whether its issue corresponds to the current object and whether its scope addresses the open question. A readable drawing for a member may still leave an assembly relationship unresolved.
Keep who supplied a reference separate from who reviewed it and what conclusion they reached. A local note does not establish receipt, applicability or approval. Missing information should remain explicit instead of being replaced by a generic reviewed status. When a proposal changes, label historical sources and identify the correspondence that must be reopened.
The empty source register helps prepare those fields outside the demonstration. The reference lens shows fictional source states only. Use the request-bundle chapter to carry current identifiers, unresolved applicability and the next responsible reader together. Actual technical and safety review belongs to the appropriate parties with the real records.
Keep these fields together
- Source ID
- Represented subject
- Current proposal
- Applicability question
- Reviewer/response
Use the blank source worksheet to record actual information from the responsible provider. Fields are intentionally empty; the fictional collection does not supply a decision, current document or real project record.
Download a blank source register (CSV)