Reference pair only
Frame A with part A, or frame B with part B, is a labelled discussion pair. It still needs drawings, material identification and physical review.
Field manual / 05
Reference is
not approval.
The board deliberately avoids a “compatible” result. Every pairing needs real supplier evidence; the status only describes this fictional record.
Revision conflict
Frame A with part B, or frame B with part A, stays on hold. A later revision does not automatically supersede an earlier interface.
No reference mapping
Relay has no hinge-cover mapping in this demo. Changing the revision or colour cannot fill that missing evidence.
What would
close the
question?
A specific pair
The supplier should identify the complete frame and replacement part, including revision, handedness and any limits. General family language is insufficient.
A stated method
Ask who may perform a replacement, using what controlled procedure, and what inspection follows. This site provides no installation or repair instructions.
A review record
Record the source document, exact sample identifiers, unresolved issues and approval owner. Keep intended use and market requirements in a separate evidence review.
Build a replacement-version recordCommon assumptions
to leave open.
Does the same colour mean the same part?
No. Colour names here describe a digital direction only. They do not define material, tooling or a mating interface.
Can the board confirm fit or protection?
No. The board organizes questions. It has no measured frame data, test reports, protective-use certification or fitting assessment.
Can a supplier approve a mixed revision?
A real supplier may provide evidence for a specific cross-revision pairing. This demo does not contain that evidence and therefore leaves the conflict visible.