What needs checking
A horizontal band makes a small height mismatch very visible at the seam. A lid and body may also show different colour even when a supplier uses the same reference.
Studio / PLANE / 45 dossier
REGISTRE / 04 / surface studies
FICTIONAL CONCEPTPLANE / 45
Wide cream jar.
Cream packaging direction; sealing, hygiene and formula suitability are unverified.
FICTIONAL PRIMARY-CONTAINER DOSSIER
- Concept capacity
- 45 ml concept target
- Substrate intent
- Opaque jar and lid; construction to be specified
- Surface
- A low body with a continuous horizontal band
- Proposed artwork area
- Body band; lid top as a separate decorated component
- Starting colour intent
- Butter 04
- Engineering status
- No tooling, dimensions or physical test evidence
SURFACE REVIEW
The decoration question.
What to bring to the review
Request individual body and lid chips plus an assembled sample. Inspect the print seam, band position and gloss under agreed lighting.
PROOF PREPARATION
A brief that stays specific.
01 /
Base body
Identify the actual substrate, coloured reference and target appearance. Ask whether the requested colour belongs in the material or in a surface treatment.
02 /
Decoration record
Provide the artwork revision, print colour reference, proposed metallic area and coating requirement separately. Do not merge them into one screenshot.
03 /
Complete assembly
Ask for an agreed physical sample set and document the tested conditions. Formula exposure, handling and assembly may affect the result.
NEXT STUDY
Carry the study forward.
No MOQ, price, lead time, recycled-content claim or certification is assigned to this fictional container. Confirm those details against the actual supplier proposal, approved construction and scope of decoration. A design direction becomes a procurement specification only after the right physical evidence is reviewed.